Kirsten Clarke and the wokist Gleichschaltung at Wikipedia
Wokies purge Wikipedia of thoughtcrime
Here is Kristen Clarke, who Joe Biden has nominated as his Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division:
As you might imagine, there’s been a lot of editing of her Wikipedia page recently. A recent edit (on the 12th of January) pointed out that she had written a letter claiming that black s were racially superior to whites because of “(neuro) menanin” which gives them “superior physical and mental abilities”:
This was taken down by Wikipedia editor RoxySaunders, who gave this reasoning:
Hi there! I removed the section called "Controversy" because it gave undue weight to material reported in Tucker Carlson Tonight, a source which should probably be avoided as our sole source for facts and quotes, especially in a BLP article. Fully reproducing a letter Clarke wrote 27 years ago gives undue prominence to Carlson's suggestion that Clarke still currently supports Afrocentric pseudoscientific theories, something even the Fox News opinion piece admits may not be true.
I've reduced the material in question to a single sentence in the "Career" section which attributes the claims to Carlson. If this story receives coverage in other reliable sources which establish this as an actually notable "Controversy", I'd support expanding this material. Best wishes, RoxySaunders (talk) 06:16, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
I’ve no idea whether Clarke still believes what she wrote in the letter 27 years ago, and it’s certainly true that people’s beliefs change over time. In my opinion the sensible thing for Wikipedia to do would be to publish the text of the letter, perhaps in a separate article in order not to give undue prominence to it in the main Kirsten Clarke article, and if there is any evidence that her beliefs on this issue have changed, publish that evidence as well.
This is not the first time that information has been removed from Wikipedia that, while being true, the disclosure of which does not suit the woke agenda. Nor will it be the last: Wokies know that the woke agenda, if it becomes widely known, will cause a massive backlash against wokies and wokism.
So what is this agenda? I think at heart wokism is (in Orwell’s classification of nationalisms) a negative nationalism against white people and Western civilisation. Wokies don’t like white people or the West. To demonstrate this, here are some things that anger wokies:
“It’s OK to be white” — Wokies don’t think it’s OK to be white. They don’t like white people (which is of course ironic given that most wokists are white).
“White lives matter” — Of course they don’t to wokists; wokists have negative affect regarding while people as a group, so saying anything in that group’s favour is bound to annoy them.
“Most things invented in the last 500 years were invented by Western civilisation” — This says something favourable about a group wokists don’t like, so it angers them. It probably angers them even more that it’s true.
“Western civilisation is the best” — Again this says something favourable about a group wokists don’t like. Ironically, the vast majority of wokists live in the West and have no intention of leaving.
Wikipedia has in recent years become more and more taken over by wokists. As this trend continues, it will no longer an encyclopedia of record, instead it’ll be a wokist propaganda outlet. We should expect the wokist Gleichschaltung to continue at Wikipedia as they purge articles of ideas that wokists regard as thoughtcrime.